Expert Witness Intelligence Platform

Every contradiction
found. Before
counsel does.

Oracli transforms 400,000 pages of raw litigation material into a defensible, contradiction-aware knowledge base — before the deposition begins, before the report is served, before opposing counsel gets there first.

See It in Action View Pricing
0M+
Documents processed per matter
0%
Contradictions surfaced pre-deposition
0+
Expert witnesses on platform
$0B+
In matters supported
01
The Problem

Expert witnesses are the linchpin of litigation. Their prep is stuck in 1995.

In complex litigation, a single expert can make or break a matter worth hundreds of millions. Yet the preparation workflow — the most critical phase — remains almost entirely manual.

Experts arrive underprepared
A paralegal drops 300,000 documents into a shared folder. The expert reads what they can. The attorney calls for a two-hour prep session the night before deposition. This is the industry standard.
Prior testimony becomes a liability
Opposing counsel has read every word of the expert's prior testimony across every case. The expert has not. A single prior statement — three years and forty cases ago — dismantles the entire opinion under cross.
The one paragraph no one read
Out of 400,000 pages of discovery, opposing counsel finds the one document that contradicts the expert's central opinion. They were always going to find it. The question is whether your expert finds it first.
68%
of expert witnesses in complex litigation face impeachment attempts on prior testimony inconsistencies alone
// Litigation Research Group, 2024
$1.8M
average expert witness fees in bet-the-company litigation — routinely dismantled in twelve minutes of cross-examination
// AICPA Expert Services Survey, 2024
2 hrs
average attorney prep time with expert before deposition across a 400,000-page complex matter
// Am Law 100 Litigation Partner Survey, 2024
02
Intelligence Architecture

From raw documents to deposition-ready in hours.

Oracli's five-layer architecture transforms a case's full document universe into a living, contradiction-aware knowledge graph — then weaponizes it for expert preparation at every stage of litigation.

01
Universal Ingestion
Native PDFs, scanned depositions, medical records, financial models, engineering schematics — every document type processed and extracted at the entity and assertion level with domain-specific OCR pipelines tuned for legal, medical, financial, and engineering content.
02
Knowledge Graph Construction
Facts, claims, entities, and dates become nodes. Typed relationships — supports, contradicts, cites, qualifies — become edges. The entire case becomes a structured intelligence layer with a traversable citation graph, not a document collection.
03
Contradiction Detection
The Contradiction Engine continuously scans the knowledge graph — surfacing conflicts between the expert's current opinions and their prior testimony, published papers, and the full case record. Every finding ranked by severity and cited to the exact page and line.
04
Adversarial Simulation
A customized deposition simulation generated from detected vulnerabilities, the opposing attorney's known deposition style, the judge's Daubert preferences, and domain-specific impeachment patterns calibrated for medical, patent, financial, or environmental testimony.
05
Report Defensibility Review
Before the expert's written report is served, Oracli scores every opinion for evidentiary support, internal logical consistency, citation accuracy, scope risk, and language that opposing counsel will mine under cross. A Defensibility Score drives targeted remediation before service.
03
Platform Capabilities

Six modules.
One defensible
expert witness.

Every module is purpose-built for the specific failure modes of expert witness testimony — not adapted from a generic document review or legal research platform.

MODULE 01
⚖️
Case Knowledge Base Builder
Ingests the full document universe — pleadings, discovery, depositions, technical reports — and constructs a structured Case Intelligence Graph with typed relationships between every factual assertion in the record.
300K+ docsOCR pipelineEntity extractionTimeline AI
MODULE 02
🎯
Contradiction Engine
Continuously scans the knowledge graph to surface internal expert contradictions, document-vs-opinion conflicts, opposing expert internal inconsistencies, and chronological impossibilities before opposing counsel finds them.
Semantic conflict detectionCross-case analysisSeverity ranking
MODULE 03
🎭
Deposition Simulation Engine
Generates a fully customized adversarial deposition calibrated to the opposing attorney's known style, the judge's evidentiary preferences, and specific vulnerabilities detected by the Contradiction Engine. Scored in real time.
Attorney style modelingLive response scoringReformulation coaching
MODULE 04
🏛️
Prior Testimony Vault
A private, encrypted repository of the expert's complete testimony history — every deposition, every trial, every technical position — structured into a Personal Position Map. Run a Conflict Scan before any new engagement is accepted.
SOC 2 Type IIPosition mappingConflict scanHIPAA
MODULE 05
🔬
Opposing Expert Intelligence
Decomposes the opposing expert's report into a structured argument tree, audits every citation against the underlying source, builds a credibility profile from prior testimony, and generates a cross-examination roadmap for deposing counsel.
Citation auditArgument tree mappingCross-exam roadmap
MODULE 06
📋
Report Defensibility Scorer
Before the expert's written report is served, reviews every opinion for evidentiary support, internal logical consistency, citation accuracy, scope risk, and language that opposing counsel will mine for impeachment under cross-examination.
Pre-service reviewLanguage risk flaggingScope analysis
04
Live Platform Preview

Oracli, in action.

Three operational views of the platform, illustrated with synthetic case data representative of real pharmaceutical liability matters. Every interaction mirrors the live product.

Henderson v. Meridian Pharma Corp. — Matter #2024-HMC-0891 — Contradiction Analysis
Source Document
Expert Report of Dr. Patricia L. Weston, M.D.  ·  Sec. 4.2 — Exposure Threshold Analysis  ·  Served Oct 14, 2024
"In my professional opinion, chronic occupational exposure to benzene at concentrations below 50 parts per million (ppm) for periods shorter than six months does not, to a reasonable degree of medical certainty, cause the hematological injury pattern consistent with the plaintiff's diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. The clinical and epidemiological literature does not support causation at these exposure thresholds."
Contradictions Detected — Scanning...
Analyzing 247,382 documents across 14 sources...
Initializing analysis engine...
Deposition Simulation — Henderson v. Meridian · Opp. Counsel: R. Caldwell, Esq. · Question 1 of 4
Cross-examination · R. Caldwell for Meridian Pharma Corp. · Style: Technical impeachment
● SIMULATION ACTIVE
Q — Opposing Counsel:
A — Expert Witness:
Oracli Coaching Note
Case Intelligence Dashboard — Henderson v. Meridian Pharma Corp. · Matter #2024-HMC-0891
Documents Ingested
0
Across 14 document types · Last synced 2h ago
Facts Extracted
0
Factual claims mapped to knowledge graph
Expert Risk Score
7.2 / 10
LowHigh
Elevated — 2 high-severity contradictions require remediation
Knowledge Graph — 18,471 nodes · 43,290 edges
Active Contradiction Log — 2 High Severity · 3 Medium
Report Sec. 4.2 vs. Harmon v. Pfizer Dep. Tr. 247:12 — FEV1 threshold inconsistency across healthy adult population definition. Expert stated 40 ppm as significant in 2021 deposition.
HIGH · M02
Report Sec. 6.1 vs. Weston (2019) J. Occup. Med. p.441 — Benzene dose-response extrapolation method conflicts with expert's own published threshold methodology.
HIGH · M02
Opposing expert (Dr. Russo) cites EPA 2014 IRIS Benzene Assessment Sec. 4.2 — text does not support cited proposition on cumulative exposure duration.
MED · M05
Meridian internal memo (Exhibit 31, Mar 3, 2021) establishes actual knowledge 62 days prior to Russo's asserted earliest knowledge date.
MED · M01
Report Sec. 8 uses "statistically significant" — language unsupported at stated confidence interval; creates scope exposure under cross-examination.
LOW · M06
05
Built For

Three buyers.
One shared imperative.

Expert witnesses don't lose cases because they lack expertise. They lose because preparation fails to anticipate how that expertise will be attacked. Oracli serves every layer of the expert engagement ecosystem.

01
🏛️
BigLaw & Litigation Boutiques
Am Law 50–200 firms with complex litigation practices retaining 10–50 expert witnesses per year. Oracli integrates with iManage and NetDocuments and deploys per-matter without disrupting existing workflows.
  • Per-matter access with no long-term commitment to start
  • Full document universe integration from existing DMS
  • Opposing Expert Intelligence for deposing adverse witnesses
  • Partner-level dashboards across all active engagements
02
🔬
Expert Management Firms
Organizations managing pools of 50–500 expert witnesses operating as outsourced expert businesses. Enterprise licensing covers the entire expert network with portfolio-level visibility and risk monitoring.
  • Enterprise licensing for the full expert headcount
  • Shared Prior Testimony Vault across the organization
  • Portfolio-level contradiction and risk monitoring
  • Usage-based revenue share model available
03
⚕️
Individual Expert Witnesses
Physicians, engineers, economists, and scientists who testify regularly at $500–$1,500/hour. Their credibility is their business. The Prior Testimony Vault becomes a deeply personal, irreplaceable professional asset.
  • Personal Testimony Vault — private and encrypted
  • Conflict Scan before accepting any new engagement
  • Full position history across every case, instantly
  • Portable across every firm that retains them
06
Social Proof
97%
Expert retention rate after first matter
4.2×
More contradictions found vs. manual prep
18 hrs
Average time saved per expert per matter
$0
Successful Daubert challenges on Oracli-prepared experts
“
We had a 47-deposition prior testimony record on our expert that we simply could not read in full. Oracli found three positions that opposing counsel had already marked for cross. We were ready. They were not expecting that.
MR
M. Rhodes
Senior Litigation Partner, Am Law 75 firm
“
As a forensic economist who testifies in twenty to thirty matters per year, I cannot manually track every position I have ever taken. Oracli's Conflict Scan caught two potential impeachment conflicts before I was even retained. That is irreplaceable.
DK
D. Kaur, Ph.D.
Forensic Economist, Independent Practice
“
The Opposing Expert Intelligence module changed how our attorneys prepare to depose adverse experts. We go into the room knowing which of their own published papers contradicts their methodology in this matter. It is an entirely different posture.
TN
T. Nakamura
Head of Complex Litigation, Regional Litigation Boutique
07
Pricing

Priced for the matter,
or the practice.

Every tier is designed to return its cost on the first matter in which a contradiction is found before opposing counsel does.

Per-Matter
Matter Access
$8K–$40K / matter
Scaled by document volume and matter duration. No long-term commitment required.
  • ✓ Full Case Knowledge Base Builder
  • ✓ Contradiction Engine (unlimited scans)
  • ✓ Deposition Simulation (3 scenarios)
  • ✓ Report Defensibility Scorer
  • ✓ Opposing Expert Intelligence
  • ✓ SOC 2 Type II compliant data isolation
Request Matter Access
Expert Seat
Expert License
$2.4K–$9.6K / year
Per expert witness. Scales with prior testimony volume and annual matter load.
  • ✓ Personal Testimony Vault (unlimited cases)
  • ✓ Conflict Scan (unlimited runs)
  • ✓ Personal Position Map
  • ✓ All Matter Access features included
  • ✓ Portable across any retaining firm
  • ✓ HIPAA-compliant for medical experts
Get Expert License
Enterprise
Firm License
Custom
For Am Law 50 firms and expert management companies. All matters, all experts, unlimited seats.
  • ✓ Unlimited matters and expert seats
  • ✓ iManage / NetDocuments integration
  • ✓ On-premise deployment option
  • ✓ Partner-level portfolio dashboards
  • ✓ Dedicated CSM and implementation
  • ✓ Custom domain expert model training
Talk to Sales
08
Founder

Built by someone who
understood the cost of failure.

"Litigation support has been transformed by technology at every layer — discovery, research, brief writing. Expert witness preparation remained untouched. Not because it's unimportant, but because it's hard. We built Oracli to do the hard thing."

Oracli was founded after observing a recurring pattern across complex litigation: expert witnesses with irreproachable credentials, dismantled under cross-examination not because their opinions were wrong — but because preparation left known vulnerabilities unaddressed. Prior testimony they hadn't reviewed. A paper they had authored that opposing counsel had read more carefully than they had. A document buried on page 187,000 of a 300,000-page production.

The legal industry's willingness to invest $2M in expert fees while spending two hours on preparation represented a structural failure that intelligence technology could close. Oracli was built to close it — not as a general-purpose legal AI, but as a purpose-built reasoning environment that understands exactly what an expert witness is, what their exposure is, and where they are most vulnerable before opposing counsel finds out first.

Headquartered in New York, NY  ·  Founded 2023

AJ
Akshat Jaimini
Founder & Chief Executive Officer
Akshat brings a rare intersection of litigation technology and AI systems expertise to Oracli. With deep experience in legal data infrastructure and applied machine learning, he identified the expert witness preparation gap as one of the last high-value, high-stakes workflows in complex litigation left entirely unserved by modern intelligence tools. Before founding Oracli, Akshat worked across legal technology ventures and enterprise AI deployments, developing a precise understanding of where AI reasoning creates durable advantage — and where it fails. He built Oracli's core architecture to be as defensible as the expert witnesses it prepares: every claim cited, every contradiction explained, every output auditable by a senior attorney.
LinkedIn Contact
09
Get Started

Your expert is about to be
deposed. Is Oracli running?

Request access for your next matter. No long-term commitment. Full case knowledge base live within 24 hours of document upload.

Request Access Talk to Sales